My interest in what I called outdoor intrusion alarms used in the Vietnam era led me to study Sonobuoys which are mostly used in Anti Submarine Warfare (Wiki: ASW). Some of the technology used in a sonobuoy is the same as used in a torpedo, so I've started reading about them. Torpedoes also make use of Gyroscopes as part of their guidance system and magnetic sensors (Sensors: magnetic, Flux Gate Patents) which are areas that interest me.
Reading about the problems of the Mk 14 Torpedo (Wiki) that made it pretty much useless for the first half of W.W.II got me interested in it's technical details.
The Wiki page lists the following problems:
YouTube: World War II Submarine Warfare - rare footage -
- It tended to run about 10 feet (3.0 m) deeper than set.
- The magnetic exploder often caused premature firing.
- The contact exploder often failed to fire the warhead.
- It tended to run "circular", failing to straighten its run once set on its prescribed gyro-angle setting, and instead, to run in a large circle, thus returning to strike the firing ship. (Wiki: USS Tullibee (SS-284), USS Tang (SS-306))
I'm not sure that's correct. It may be more accurate to say the Mk VI magnetic exploder failed to explode the torpedo under a variety of conditions and that occasionally it also caused a premature firing.
I have a book (forget title) where, in a chapter on the start of W.W.II, they talk about the ultimate weapon, i.e. one where there is no defense. No, it was not the atomic bomb, that did not exist until late in W.W.II, but instead was the high altitude bomber. RADAR did not exist at the start of W.W.II so there was no defense and this was a very scary time. What they did not know was that there was no way to drop bombs with precision.
The torpedo that could be launched from a small boat (Wiki: Torpedo Boat) was a threat to the naval ships of the time no mater how big and powerful they were. The first response was for navies to develop torpedo boat chasers aka torpedo boat destroyers. The latter name got shortened to destroyer (Wiki) and means a boat that is fast in order to chase torpedo boats. Destroyers are a part of a battle fleet (Wiki) that was used up to W.W.II. With the advent of air power they are now called Carrier Battle Groups (Wiki). For a short time there were Battle Ships (Wiki) that had big guns, but they were never a viable weapon and are no longer the center of naval strategy and in fact were obsolete before Pearl Harbor.
The VT-8 (Wiki) torpedo bombers flying the Douglas TBD Devastator (Wiki) in the battle of Midway (Wiki) carried the Mk 13 torpedo (Wiki), most of which did not work.
- Ran Cold 36%
- Sank: 20%
- Poor deflection performance: 20%
- unsatisfactory depth performance: 18%
- Ran on surface: 2%
- Satisfactory run: 31%
- Note 111% total means some had multiple problems. These are similar to the problems with the Mk 14 torpedo above.
Project Nobska (Wiki)
Wiki page for battleships says "the value of investment in battleships has always been contested", my guess is that like torpedoes there was no way to accurately aim big guns at long ranges. The technology available at the end of W.W. II was embodied in the Torpedo Data Computer and the Gun Director (Wiki) to aim naval guns. Both these are based on the idea that the optimum firing solution can be computed at the time of firing but from then on there is no guidance of any kind. This puts a real limit on the maximum range for a 50% chance of hitting a target for both big naval guns, torpedoes and horizontal bombing. My guess is that the accurate range is much shorter that the physical range of shells or torpedoes.
In the summer of 1956 the Nobska Study added a large spherical SONAR dome to the front of many subs (Wiki: Thresher) which required the torpedo tubes to be located midships and angled outward. It also found that a high speed homing torpedo (the Fido Mk 46 (Wiki) was a low speed torpedo) was possible leading to the Mk 46 (Wiki) and Mk 48 (Wiki) torpedoes.
The Japanese W.W. II type 93 torpedo (Wiki) has a stated range of 20,000 to 40,000 meters but as far as I know there is no way it could have been aimed with enough accuracy to hit a capital ship at that range. They solved that by putting a man in a longer version (Wiki: Kaiten).
A similar thing happened with air-to-air missiles. i.e. their range far exceeds the vision of a pilot. That means that if a pilot fires an air-to-air missile based on his RADAR he may very well shoot down a friendly aircraft (this happened and changed the rules of engagement). So as of now the useful range of air-to-air missiles is far shorter than what they are physically capable of achieving.
This also applies to horizontal bombing, see Norden Bomb Sight and the guns on battleships, or any gun fired at a high angle, see Big Guns Disconnect below and Ballistics
The Naval Gun at Iwo Jima 1945 US Navy Tactical Report; Battleship Gun Performance - an example of how horizontal bombing and naval guns are ineffective.Dreyer Fire Control Table that may be dated in the 1930s. When you read it there's a feeling that nothing will really work, which is the case. This is because of the problems with high angle fire from barrels with rifling (see External Ballistics)
Here's a Wiki page talking about the
This may be helpful to figure out which patents go with which devices.1866 Whitehead Torpedo (Wiki) starts to be used
1891 Italian Illustration
Note "The Secret" (2) is in front of the air flask (3). Appears to be using the Brotherhood 3 cly radial engine (4).
1892 Whitehead Mk 1 designed 1892, used 1894–1913
1892 Whitehead Mk 1B designed for E.W. Bliss production, used 1894–1922
1893 Whitehead Mk 2 designed for E.W. Bliss production, used 1896–1913
1893 Whitehead Mk 3 designed for E.W. Bliss production, used 1898–1922 (adds Orby steering Gyro)
1898 Whitehead Manual Illustration (Wiki)
1901 Whitehead Mk 5 designed, Mfg in UK, used: 1910–1922
1904 Bliss-Leavitt (Wiki) Mk 1 to Mk 6 designed, used: 1904–1922
1911 Bliss-Leavitt Mk 7 to Mk 9, used: 1912–1945 (Wiki)
---- W.W.I 1914 to 1918 ----
1925 Mk 13 air or PT boat launched anti-surface ship torpedo, used: 1936–1950 (16,600 built)
1931 Mk 14 Sub launched anti-surface ship torpedo designed, used: 1931 to 1980 (13,000 made)
1938 Mk 15 destroyer launched anti-surface ship torpedo designed, used: 1938-1956 (9,700 built)
1940 Mk 17 heavy torpedo, not used
--- W.W. II 1939 to 1945 ----
1942 Mk 19 Westinghouse follow on to the Mk 18 - only prototypes built
1942 Mk 24 "Fido" aircraft launched anti-sub torpedo designed, used: 1942–1948, (4050 built), made by GE & WE
1943 Mk 20 NTS Newport prototype sub launched
1943 Mk 16 sub launched anti-surface ship torpedo, used 1943–1975, (only 1,700 built)
1943 Mk 18 sub launched anti-surface ship electric torpedo, used 1943–1950 (9,000 built)
1943 Mk 21 Westinghouse attempt at the Mk 24 - only prototypes built
1944 Mk 34 Improved Fido aircraft launched anti-sub torpedo designed, used: 1948-1958, made by AMF, NOS Forest Park
1963 Mk 46 Mod 0 in service 12-3/4" dia x 8' 6" long - light weight anti submarine
1972 Mk 48 Mod 0 in service. 21" dia x 19' long. Wire guided plus active & passive SONAR terminal guidance. Magnetic Exploder
The word Torpedo refers to an explosive that's in the water, so includes sea mines. "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" (Wiki) is in reference to Naval mines, not what we think of a torpedoes today. The word also is used in conjunction with small explosive devices that are used on rail road tracks to a train. The idea is that the first wheel on the engine will cause an explosion that can be heard over the noise. These may be used in some pattern. The "Bangalore torpedo" (Wiki) is a long explosive used to breach a barbed wire obstacle, like at the Normandy landing.
The automotive or fish torpedo is one that has its own propulsion. Without propulsion it would be a sea or Naval mine.
Torpedoes are designed with the launch platform and target in mind since these are key design parameters used to optimize function. Since the original meaning of the word "torpedo" is something like "explosive" there can be four launch platforms and four target types.
Links to Wiki.
Torpedo bomber Fido, the Mk 24 Mine Bomb
Phalanx Type 93
Torpedo Tomahawk Land SAM
The above table is just to give an idea and no attempt was made to present an exhaustive list of options. Like at the start of W.W.II where the high altitude bomber was considered the ultimate weapon because there was no defense, a similar situation exists today (2017) when ballistic missiles are used with conventional warheads. The approach speed combined with the range of a radar warning system results in a warning time of much less than a minute, i.e. not enough time to do anything. If an enemy has a satellite system similar to NOSS (Wiki) that can locate large capital ships and a ballistic missile system with terminal guidance (like China has), there is the potential of targeting ships in mid ocean. With a missile coming almost straight down at high speed there is no defense.
There seems to be no current weapon system for submarines to attack aircraft or for land based attacks on submarines.The Patrol Torpedo Boats Documentary -
PT Boat Forum -
Note the a small PT boat can sink a very large ship and so the PT boat destroyer was developed. Since PT boats were very fast the destroyer also needed to be vary fast. But SONAR does not work when a ship is going fast.
On 19 Aug 2017 the wreckage of the USS Indianapolis (Wiki) was found. It was sank by the Japanese sub I-58 (Wiki) using Type 95 (Wiki) 21" torpedoes. The loss of life was the highest for a single war time attack at sea. In the movie USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage (IMDB) it was pointed out that the ship was doomed even if the captain had zig-zaged because the I-58 was carrying 6 each Kaiten torpedoes (Wiki). These were the Kamikaze (Wiki) version of the 24" Type 93 torpedo (Wiki). Note no torpedo tube was used for the Kaiten torpedoes. They were mounted on the deck on a couple of "V" blocks with an air lock between the sub and torpedo so that the Kamikaze could climb on board just prior to firing. If the sub captain had observed Zig-Zaging then he would have used the Kaiten instead of the type 95 torpedoes. Note that the gyro was removed from the Type 93 and replaced by the Kamikaze for guidance in the Kaiten.
Early torpedos were dumb. That's to say they just ran in a more or less straight line. But the more modern torpedos are designed for a specific task and to that end have an embedded strategy. For example an early strategy for a torpedo designed to attack a surface ship would include a rule that it can not go below some depth so that it would not attack a firing submarine. A converse strategy would be used for a ship launched torpedo designed to attack a submarine, i.e. it would always be below some depth that would protect the firing ship.
There are also strategies for search patterns of the torpedo does not detect a target and that strategy will depend on the characteristics of the target, i.e. surface ship or submarine.
2341287 Torpedo controlling device, George Pookhir, Rubissow George A, Feb 8, 1944, 114/23 -
This ranges from tens of pounds to a couple of thousand pounds of various explosives. In one case any unused fuel is also "exploded" increasing the yield. The destructive power of the explosive depends on its location relative to the target. For example a torpedo hitting the side of a ship and exploding using a contact fuze is much less effective than the same amount of explosive detonating directly under the keel.
977438 Automobile torpedo, Gregory Caldwell Davison, Dec 6, 1910, - I think he saw the result of a shaped charge (Wiki) by placing the explosive behind the air tank, but that idea was not yet realized. The Bazooka (Wiki) was based on understanding how shaped charges work and came out in 1942. This idea might have been good for torpedoes ramming the side of ships, but they soon worked by exploding under the hull.
Whatever energy source is used to power a torpedo (or anything) it represents a liability in that if the energy is released at some time other than when it's wanted there's a big problem. The more energy the bigger the problem.
In The Devil's Device (Ref 5) it's mentioned that the Japanese Type 93 Long Lance was powered by Hydrogen Peroxide although the Wiki page for the Type 93 says it was pure oxygen. Some key specs: 24" diameter, 20,000 to 40,000 meter range at 58 to 39 miles/hr., 1000+ pounds of explosives, no bubbles since the products of combustion were CO2 (dissolves in water) and pure water. See Background for a discussion of physical range and useful range above.
The Howell Torpedo (Wiki) used the energy stored in a flywheel that started out at 10,000 PRM as both the energy source and acted as a gyroscope for maintaining a true azimuth.311325 Marine Torpedo, J.S. Howell, Jan 27, 1885, 114/24; 114/122; 114/20.1; 114/22; 440/66 -
311326 Apparatus for Launching Torpedoes, J.A. Howell, Jan 27, 1885, 114/239 - Required to spin up flywheel.
The Whitehead Torpedo (Wiki) started out using a flask of compressed air to drive a piston engine. (Note: it's very common to power model steam engines using compressed air). Over time the technology to make compressed air containers improved allowing higher and higher pressures. But the US was not able to make the high pressure air flasks. (PS the US was not able to make a 1 arc second surveying transit like the Wild T1 during W.W.II) The Bliss Co. bought rights to make the Whitehead torpedo.
693872 Propulsion of torpedoes, &c., by compressed air, Frank M Leavitt, Bliss E W Co, Feb 25, 1902, 114/20.1; 60/727; 60/786 - adds a heater for the air by burning liquid fuel
943833 Air-heater for automobile torpedoes, Frank M Leavitt, Bliss E W Co, Dec 21, 1909, 60/39.48 - improvement relating to the pressure of liquid fuel going into burner.
858266 Automobile torpedo, Gregory C Davison, US Navy, Jun 25, 1907, 114/20.1 -Curtiss turbine for Whitehead torpedo
1036082 Automobile torpedo, Gregory Caldwell Davison, Electric Boat Co, Aug 20, 1912, 60/39.91, 60/39.57, 60/39.53, 60/39.823 - burn oxygen and add water for steam.
Later the air was heated using some fuel which increased the energy. Later still water was added both to cool the engine and to get more energy from the steam.
Some Torpedoes were powered with what amounts to rocket fuel being used as a gas generator, but there were safety issues transporting the fuel.
There is a problem with the various types of air power, they leave a trail of bubbles in the water which traces a path back from the torpedo to the submarine that fired it. Needless to say escort ships will quickly be attacking the sub.
Finally batteries were used with an electric motor. Battery powered torpedoes do not leave any trail, so the escort ships do not know where to find the sub.
3005864 Sea water battery, Duncan T Sharpe, Bell Telephone Lab, Filed: Mar 29, 1945 (16 year delay) Pub: Oct 24, 1961 - maybe the Mk 18 torpedo (Wiki)
405196 Galvanic battery, John A. Barrett, J.A. Barret Battery Co., Jun 11, 1889 - chloride of-silver battery
1332483 Sea-water battery for vessels, Bridge Arthur, Mar 2, 1920 -
2176428 Secondary or storage battery, Kershaw William Ernest, Electric Storage Battery Co, Oct 17, 1939 -
2317711 Accumulator, Andre Henri Georges, Priority: Feb 4, 1936 Pub: Apr 27, 1943 -
The early engines were specially built, but were conventional piston designs (Wiki) used for steam/compressed air. Turbines can also be used with compressed air, heated compressed air, or heated compressed air with water added to make steam. Note that an air breathing Otto Cycle (Wiki) or Diesel Cycle (Wiki) engine will not work because there's no source of combustion air. The Brotherhood Co. made a 3-cylinder radial motor that was used for many decades. It was a flathead engine (Wiki) which made it fit into a smaller space than an Overhead Valve Engine (Wiki).
323270 Valve Gear, Peter Brotherhood (Wiki), UK, Jul 28, 1885, 91/353 - like all radial engines (Wiki) this one has an odd number of cylinders (3) but unlike aircraft radial engines that have overhead valves (Wiki) this engine has side valves, i.e. a flat head design (Wiki) making it smaller in diameter.
Dieter knows about engines and holds a number of torpedo patents that are assigned to E.W. Bliss.
701857 Motor, William Dieter, Hartvig Orum, Irving O'Hara, 1902-06-10, - for boats or motorcycles
746626 Steam-engine, William Dieter, 1903-12-08, -in-line 3 cylinder
927434 Air-heater for compressed-air engines, Harold W Shonnard, William Dieter, EW Bliss Co, 1909-07-06, - "In utilizing compressed air as a source of power it is desirable to provide means for heating the compressed air before admitting it to the engine, in order to increase the energy of the engine and avoid the inconveniences attending the expansion of unheated compressed air. This method is of especial importance in automobile torpedoes. For this purpose, owing to the brief time available, the heating is necessarily performed by the burning of a fluid fuel such as alcohol or gasolene directly in the compressed air, so that the hot products of combustion commingle with the heated air and flow to the engine. The heater or combustion chamber is in some cases placed within the compressed air reservoir; in other cases it is formed as an enlargement in the pipe or conduit leading from the reservoir to the engine."
1152004 Fluid-pressure motor for driving torpedoes, Georges Henri Marius Canton, France, Aug 31, 1915, 92/70, 74/60, 92/71, 123/51.0AA, 123/56.6, 92/163 - maybe a swash-plate motor. These offer inherent balance thus reducing vibrations.Turbine
1609361 Radial cylinder engine, Edward Jones Albert, Whitehead Torpedo Company Ltd, Dec 7, 1926, 91/481, 123/90.6, 91/185, 123/54.2, 91/331, 91/492, 92/72 - 4 cylinders in the first pancake then another similar pancake offset by 45 degrees making for a very compact engine (motor?).
3151527 Barrel engine, Hamlin Halley H, Clevite Corp, Oct 6, 1964, 91/507, 91/176, 74/60, 92/57, 91/503, 114/20.2 - wobble plate, low vibration design
858266 Automobile torpedo, Gregory C Davison, Jun 25, 1907, 114/20.1 - counter rotating turbine wheels cancel gyroscopic action so as not to interfere with stability. An especially big problem when the torpedo is launched above the water. The "balanced" design.
1088080 Driving mechanism for torpedoes, Frank M Leavitt, Bliss E W Co, 24. Feb 1914, 416/129, 416/171, 114/20.1 -
Special fuels can be used where the fuel provides the oxidizer (Wiki).
In 19th Century Torpedoes (Ref 13) there's a discussion of the propeller and how John Ericsson (Wiki), Robert Wilson (Wiki), Francis Pettit Smith (Wiki) and Victor von Scheliha all had something to do with the invention of the propeller (Wiki).
After steam engines (Wiki, my cars web page) were being used on land; the first use on water was the river steam boat (Wiki). At that time the two propulsion methods were sail and paddle wheel steam. The military would not consider a paddle wheel boat because it presented too big a target. But they were also reluctant to test rotating sculls which we now call propellers. The propeller not only is under water and out of sight (not a target) but it also allows positioning the engine below the water line so it's also not a target. Propellers also do not do as much damage to the bank of a river as does a paddle wheel. Note that a disaster can occur if a steam powered paddle wheel gets lifted out of the water, like in rough seas. That's why most paddle wheel boats operate on lakes or rivers where the water is calm.
The early Torpedoes used a single propeller, but the problem is that tends to rotate the body of the torpedo in the opposite direction. The first fix for that was to use coaxial counter rotating propellers or parallel shaft counter rotating propellers. All of the above requires some type of gearing. An alternate way is to make a special motor were the rotor and stator each have their own output shafts that are naturally counter rotating, but these may not be well balanced. A similar turbine design may have been tried to get direct counter rotation.
2462182 Motor having coaxial counter-rotating shafts, Bluman John E, Guerdan Dikran A, Westinghouse Electric Corp, Filed: Nov 28, 1945, Pub: Feb 22, 1949, 310/115, 114/20.2, 417/69 - counter rotating coaxial output shaftsThe first generation torpedoes used hydrostat (Wiki) only depth control and it was a failure. Sometimes the torpedo would hit the bottom and other times it would oscillate and at the top of the cycle "porpoise" and break the surface. When Whitehead solved this by using a combination of a hydrostat and pendulum, instead of patenting the idea, it was kept Secret and became part of the information a company or government got when they paid him for the design.
There are a couple of problems with the hydrostat plus pendulum working together on the Uhlan principle.
1. The static pressure going to the diaphragm depends on the depth under water. For sea water it's about 0.445 pounds per foot of depth. But when the torpedo has forward motion the dynamic pressure at the diaphragm depends on both the depth of the torpedo and the Bernoulli effect (Wiki) or Venturi effect (Wiki) associated with the location of the diaphragm on the torpedo body. The problem is that the diaphragm was located on the tapered tail section where, because of the Bernoulli effect, the dynamic pressure is lower than the static pressure causing the torpedo to sense a lower pressure (like when near the surface) than it should causing it to run deeper.
2. When gyroscopes are used in aircraft or ships for navigation it's important that they be located at the center of mass of the vehicle. Otherwise there is a lever arm acting between the center of mass and the location of the gyro that adds an error acceleration to the gyro thus causing an error. I suspect that the same thing happened to the Mk 14 (and other) torpedoes if the depth setting pendulum location was not at the center of mass of the torpedo.
899304 Immersion-regulator particularly adapted for torpedoes, Albert Edward Jones, Whitehead & Company,
Sep 22, 1908, 114/25 - "..a hdrostatic piston and a pendulum is employed".
2604065 Depth control system for torpedoes, Elmer William B, Sec of Navy, Filed: Aug 31, 1945 (7 year delay) Pub: Jul 22, 1952, 114/25 - but is positioned on the sloping part of the tail = hydrodynamic problem.
Calls prior patents:
899304 see The Secret abvoe
1080116 Steering mechanism for automobile torpedoes, Frank M Leavitt, Bliss E W Co, Dec 2, 1913, 114/24, 114/25 - Hydrostat (K), pendulum (F) and Gyroscope (G) provide steering inputs. again hydrostat is located on sloping part of tail = hydrodynamic problem..
1323347 Broaching Device for Torpedoes, L. M. Aspimwall, Westinghouse, Dec 2, 1919, 114/25 - causes the torpedo to broach (to break the surface from below) at the end of its run to make recovery easier when practicing.
1360325 Horizontal steering-gear for torpedoes, Simmon Karl A, Westinghouse Electric & Mfg Co, Nov 30, 1920, 114/24, 114/144.00R - Gyro
1370688 System of radiocontrol, Jr John Hays Hammond, Filed: Jan 22, 1914, Pub: Mar 8, 1921, 91/459, 342/423, 114/21.1, 91/464, 324/140.00R, 343/855, 91/465, 92/131 - Crude radio control of torpedo
1378291 Driving and governing means for torpedoes, Sperry Elmer A, Filed: Apr 2, 1915, Pub: May 17, 1921, 114/20.1, 114/23, 114/122, 114/24, 114/25 - not clear if only a pendulum is used for depth control - huge gyro takes up a lot of space.
1378740 Autogubernator, Thomas Walkup Samuel, Filed: Jul 30, 1917, Pub: May 17, 1921, 318/589, 200/183, 114/23 - depth is not mentioned
1532616 Equilibrating mechanism for flying machines, Erastus E Winkley, Filed: Jun 25, 1918, Pub: Apr 7, 1925, 244/177, 244/80, 185/29, 185/2, 244/14 - pendulum
2974623 Torpedo depth steering engine control, Ballou Jack W, Harvey Brooks, Filed: Aug 17, 1951, (10 year delay) Pub: Mar 14, 1961, 114/25 - "3. A depth control device for underwater vehicles comprising, in combination, a depth controlling means having a Uhlan principle type pendulum and hydro-diaphragm assembly linked to the valve of an air depth engine,..." The Uhlan principle is mentioned in Chapter 4 The Afterbody and its mechanisms of OP 635 Torpedoes Mk 14 and 23 Types, 24 March 1945.
3045627 Depth control system, Eck Robert C, Sec of Navy, Filed: May 24, 1956 (6 year delay) Pub: Jul 24, 1962, 114/25, 367/95, 114/277 - prior art systems have +/- 3% depth error. An increasing problem for depths of 1,000 feet. Intended for towed submersibles, not torpedoes.
3393655 Gas steering and propulsion system for missiles, Eastma David P, Clevite Corp, Jul 23, 1968, 114/20.1 - Figure shows counter rotating props. Pendulum & bellows for depth - mainly about using high pressure CO2 as control energy.
The early torpedos were straight line devices. Either the launcher was on a turntable and could be aimed or the ship needed to be brought to a heading pointing in the launch direction. Note that the launch direction is not a line pointing to the target, but rather is the result of solving the target triangle (Wiki). This triangle has sides proportional to the speed of the target and the speed of the torpedo where the solution is to aim the torpedo ahead of the target by the correct amount to get a hit. The Torpedo Data Computer (Wiki: TDC) of W.W.II was a electromechanical computer that could solve the triangle and take into account the use of a settable gyroscope.
Later torpedos had settable gyroscopes (see a couple on my Gyroscopes web page) which allow firing the torpedo with the launching ship at any azimuth. The output of the TDC is the gyro setting and for W.W.II or newer torpedoes can be set while the torpedo is in the tube ready to launch. The gyro is constantly being updated so the time of launch is determined by the captain and not where the tube is pointing.
The torpedo will:
1. Run in a straight line for the "reach" distance, then...
2. make a turn with a known radius ending on the azimuth that was set into the gyro, then...
3. run in a straight line to the target, then...
4. if a modern torpedo with a strategy misses the target it will search for a new target.
This means a torpedo can be launched from either a bow or stern tube toward a target at any azimuth.
The more modern torpedos (and some of the very earliest versions) use an electrical wire to control their heading. In the more modern ones this allows the SONAR (Wiki) in the launching ship to be used to initially guide the torpedo to prevent the problem of the torpedo acquiring it's target using an active SONAR. The latest torpedos have 2-way communication on the wire allowing the launching ship to see what the torpedo SONAR is seeing and thus help it lock on the correct target.
Another option is to replace gyroscopes with an Inertial Navigation System (Wiki). Note that the drift of MEMs gyroscopes used in an INS is high but the run time between launch and the explosion of the warhead is measured in minutes so may not be a problem.
Starting with Fido, the Mk 24 Mine (Wiki) was an anti submarine torpedo that was the first to use acoustic homing. The key problem was to minimize the noise generated by the torpedo itself. This involved mechanically isolating noisy parts using gaskets including separating the warhead/sensor from the propulsion end. But there remained the water noise similar to the noise a microphone experiences when it's windy. The deeper the torpedo is the higher the water pressure and so the higher speed that's allowed on the propeller without cavitation (Wiki).
It turns out that Fido could only hear loud submarines, i.e. when they were cavitating (Wiki) which happens when a propeller is run a a high speed and happens less as the water pressure is higher. W.W.II subs could avoid Fido id they ran silent rather than at full speed. The same applies to the CRT-1 Sonobuoy, i.e. it could hear a cavitating sub but probably not a silent running sub.
San Francisco Maritime org: Torpedo Angle Solvers Mark 7 and Mods., Description and Instructions for Use
Hedy Lamarr (Wiki)
Her intent behind patent 2292387 Secret Communication System, Hedy K. Markey & George Antheil, Filed: June 10, 1941, Pub: Aug 11, 1942 was to have a jam proof signal which would be the basis of a radio remote control for a torpedo (USNI: Naval Warfare and the Most Beautiful Woman in the World).
The USNI article says: "The sinking of the SS City of Benares (Wiki) by a German U-boat on 18 September 1940" was a key motivating factor. The idea was to make U.S. torpedoes more accurate so they could better sink German boats.
Note this patent does not seem to have been classified or "locked in a safe" as many of the current articles say since the time between filing and publication was only 10 months. It was made public during the early days of W.W.II. Patents that have military value and which are classified have delays on the order of 5 to 30 years, see Crypto Patents and China Lake Patents or the Fido Mk24 Torpedo patent 2615416 below.
The USNI article says: "The military dismissed the Secret Communication System largely because of sexist biases about women’s roles that were amplified by Lamarr’s screen persona." I wonder if there was also a technical basis. For example W.W.II torpedoes run under salt water where a radio antenna does not work. Any "Radio" remote control will have a problem since it needs an antenna that's out of the water. Also the launching submarine typically dives after the launch to hide since the bubbles coming from the torpedo point to the launching sub, i.e. direct destroyers to the sub. So the idea of a sub staying at periscope depth and following the path of it's torpedo (how? I doubt a periscope can see the bubble trail, i.e. the point of view needs to be much higher) and sending steer right or left commands does not make a lot of sense. This approach would devolve into a small surface ship filled with explosives, and so not be effective.
The patent includes provisions to start both paper tapes at the instant the torpedo is launched and to synchronize the two tapes after launch. This is necessary for a practical system. The stock ticker "Unison" device was the subject of much work. It's purpose was to keep the type wheel on the printing telegraph at the same position as the wheel on the sending telegraph.
YouTube: The History Guy:
Hedy Lamarr and the Torpedo - mentions a possible use on sonobuoys, but the CRT-1 has a simple voice transmitter that can only be heard within a short distance from the buoy since it is a low power VHF signal that is line of sight, so no problems with eavesdropping or jamming.
The first generation Whitehead torpedoes were intended to run in a straight line. They had short fins that ran in a helix around the body to counter the tendency of the torpedo body to spin in a direction opposite to the rotation of the single propeller. Even after switching to coaxial counter rotating twin propellers, eliminating the need for the helix fins, the torpedo would not run straight at 100 or more yards. So the Orby gyro was added to keep it straight.
Later the gyroscope was combined with the idea of launching the torpedo in whatever direction the launch vehicle was going and then having the torpedo make a controlled turn to a line that would intersect the path of a ship on a constant heading with the correct timing so the torpedo would hit the ship.
621364 Device for starting torpedoes, Ludwig Obry, Mar 21, 1899, 114/24; 74/5.12 - applied to the Whitehead Torpedo (Wiki)
785425 Steering mechanism for torpedoes, Frank M Leavitt, E.W. Bliss Co, Mar 21, 1905, 114/24; 114/122; 74/5R - complains that the Orby gyro is delicate and hard to adjust. gyro controls a SPDT switch which in turn controls electromagnets.
795045 Gyroscopic control apparatus, Frank M Leavitt, E.W. Bliss Co, Jul 18, 1905, 114/24; 114/21.1; 74/5R - general purpose gyro stabilized platform
839161 Steering apparatus for automobile torpedoes, Frank M Leavitt, E.W. Bliss Co, Dec 25, 1906, 114/24; 114/122; 74/5R - Leavitt gyro to replace the Orby gyro (Wiki)
Fig 1 Launch and initial turn toward target.
a: shortened course by means of this patent
a': old longer time wasting course where there's only one turning radius.
Fig 2 showing the gyro in relationship to the torpedo.
Fig 3 torpedo on course
894838 Gyroscopic steering-gear for torpedoes, Frank M Leavitt, E.W. Bliss Co, Aug 4, 1908, 114/24; 74/5.12 - ability to "set" the course prior to launching the torpedo
925709 Gyroscopic steering-gear, Frank M Leavitt, E.W. Bliss Co, Jun 22, 1909, 114/20.1; 114/24; 74/5.22 - easily removed gyro assembly
1030134 Automatic steering device for torpedoes, H W Shonnard, Jun 18, 1912, 114/24; 114/238; 74/5.12 - spin up gyro prior to releasing torpedo
1145025 Gyroscopic steering device, Frank M Leavitt, EW Bliss Co, 1915-07-06, -
Fig 1. Dynamo (G) driven from prop shaft supplies DC for motor that's part of the flywheel.
BC Note: I doubt this was put into production since most torpedo hits happened at ranges far less than the catalog spce Max Range. So keeping the gyro spinning for more time does not improve anything and so a waste of time.
1148154 Gyroscopic device, William Dieter, EW Bliss Co, 1915-07-27, -
has the look and feel of the Mk 12-3
1153678 Gyroscopic steering mechanism, William Dieter, EW Bliss Co,1915-09-14, -
Fig 1 Prior Art of angle fire
Fig 2 Improvement of present invention.
Fig 3 Torpedo in plan view
Fig 4 Plan view of gyro mechanism
Fig 5 Vertical longitudinal section of gyro echanism
1185210 Gyroscope-spinning mechanism, Frank M Leavitt, EW Bliss Co, 1916-05-30 -
1204852 Gyroscopic steering mechanism, William Dieter, EW Bliss Co, 1916-11-14, -
1318980 Gyroscopic steering mechanism, William Dieter, EW Bliss Co, 1919-10-14, -
Reduced pressure compressed air impinges on the buckets on the outside of the flywheel to keep it going
1322232 Gyroscopic mechanism, William Dieter, EW Bliss Co, 1919-11-18, -
"When a gyroscope is thus spun up and un locked, it continues running during several minutes under impulse of the momentum stored up in the fly-wheel,..." BC: this is long enough.
"...provides means, whereby the gyroscope after being initially spun up in the ordinary manner may be maintained at speed by the turbine driving effect of compressed air. In the preferred development of the invention high pressure or flask pressure air is employed for initially spinning up the gyroscope, and low pressure air is employed for the subsequent driving of the gyroscope, so as to keep it up to speed. "
BC Note: I doubt this was put into production since most torpedo hits happened at ranges far less than the catalog spec Max Range. So keeping the gyro spinning for more time does not improve anything and so a waste of time.
1440822 Gyroscope steering mechanism, Dieter William, Vittlea Dev Corp, 1923-01-02
1791755 Gyroscopic steering mechanism, Dieter William, EW Bliss Co, 1931-02-10, -
This is about the low pressure air that impinges on the flywheel to extend the range. No the high pressure air used to get the gyro spinning quickly
1303038 Automobile Torpedo, W. Dieter, E.W. Bliss Co, - "This invention relates to automobile torpedoes having automatic steering mechanism, such as the well-known gyroscopic steering mechanism. The purpose of the invention is to make provision for interrupting the normal steering after the torpedo has completed a predetermined portion of its normal run and to thereupon cause the torpedo to steer in an approximately circular course."
While reading The Devil's Device (Ref 5) the author never talks about the problem of guiding the torpedo to its target. By stating the speed and range of a torpedo (like the Japanese Type 93 (Wiki) makes is seem that it is effective at that range, but as far as I know no torpedo has been effective at anywhere near that kind of range because there's has not been a guidance system that good.
The inputs to the TDC are the bearing of the sub and it's speed. The bearing of the target from the periscope and the distance to the target from active SONAR (Wiki) pings. Torpedo parameters like: dead time (from firing command to torpedo movement), torpedo speed, turning circle radius, "reach" distance, latitude where gyro calibrated &Etc. The output is the gyro angle.
When the ideas from Ref 8 are taken into account the prediction of the target's position can have an error bar added depending on the predicted time between the fire command and the explosion of the torpedo. Also based on these same ideas of energy maneuverability (see: Ref 8) the characteristics of the torpedo and be optimized for its target list.736557 Electrical Range-finder, Harry Shoemaker, Aug 18, 1903 - two transits have readouts to allow doing triangulation
970431 Torpedo-Director, Gregory Caldwell Davison, Electric Boat Corp, 1910-09-13, telescope with mechanical parts to solve triangle using a graphic type solution.
1468712 Sighting Device, Hannibal C Ford, FORD INSTR CO Inc, 1923-09-25 - the primary patent for TDC and GD.
also see 2439209 below which was filed in 1925 - i.e. was a secret for 23 years.
2022275 Device for indicating the position of ships, Davis Arthur Pattison, David M Mahood, Arma Eng Co., Filed: Nov 10, 1927, Pub: Nov 26, 1935, 73/178.00R, 114/144.00E, 340/988, 235/61.0NV - continuously computes the Lat and Lon of a ship by using its speed and heading. A precursor to the TDC.
2406324 Gun control system, Pattison Davis Arthur, Arma Corp, Filed: Sep 6, 1933, Pub: Aug 27, 1946, 89/41.2, 318/595, 89/41.4 - aiming guns mounted on a moving ship trying to hit another moving ship is very similar to the problem solved by the TDC. Arma Engineering worked on both problems.
Torpedo director,Crooke Raymond E, Ford Instr Co Inc, Filed: Jan 27, 1940, Pub: Jun 11, 1946, 235/403 - diagram shows torpedo making a 90 deg turn, is that always the case
2402088 Torpedo director, Ross Elliott P, Ford Instr Co Inc, Filed: Apr 29, 1940, Pub: Jun 11, 1946, 235/403 - includes curve in path due to gyro angle
Torpedo director, Crooke Raymond E, Ford Instr Co Inc, Filed: May 15, 1941, Pub: Jul 9, 1946, 235/403 - includes curve in path due to gyro angle, torpedo run distance (time) is an output,, patent includes equations solved.
2413846 Torpedo director, Ross Elliott P, Ford Instr Co Inc, Filed: Jun 20, 1941, Pub: Jan 7, 1947, 235/403 -
2439209 Torpedo director, Halsey Arthur Sherman, US Secretary of Navy, App: 1925-06-15 (23 year delay) Pub:1948-04-06, 235/403; 235/84; 89/203 - mechanical computer
2476746 Director for computing torpedo attack courses, Earl E Libman, Control Instrument Co, 1949-07-19, - "This invention relates to improvements in torpedo control Systems and has particular reference to a director for computing the values of the factors involved in firing a torpedo in line with the fore and aft axis of a ship and the point of intercept with a target." Cites 4 patents, Cited by 6 patents.
2570276 Fire control system, John E Reierson, 1951-10-09, - guns firing at moving targets -"lead" based on range, elevation, speed & course
2911145 Torpedo director, Eugene Odin, Noel Urquhart, Bosch Arma Corp, Filed: Jan 28, 1939 (20 year delay), Pub: Nov 3, 1959, 235/403, 235/405 - "The general method of this invention is predicated upon the solution of the torpedo problem equation R*sin(G-Br) = H*sin( I+J+P) * sin(G), where all of the terms of the equation are functions of G. (the Gyro angle)"
Wiki, Mk 1 FCC) for Naval Guns and they attempt to solve the same problem relating to the movement of the target, weapon launching ship/boat and the time of flight. It seems to me that there's no way a ballistic round can have enough accuracy to hit the largest target at the stated range of a big naval gun in W.W.II. They did not understand the modern corrections made for long range shooting, that's to say only very fundamental corrections were made. Note Ford Instruments has the patents on both the TDC and GD.
The Wiki page for 16"/50 caliber Mark 7 gun says the muzzle velocity is 2500 feet per second and the max range is 24 miles. The actual path is a modified parabola and the round slows down as it flies, so using a straight line calculation of the time of flight will under estimate the actual time of flight.
24 miles = 126,720 feet
126720 / 2500 = 51 seconds. I expect if the actual path was used and the slowing of the shell taken into account the actual flight time will be closer to 3 to 5 minutes.
A ship moving 16 miles per hour, moves 84,480 feet/hour, 23 feet per second, so in 51 seconds moves 1,197 feet or about 400 yards.
The big gun that shelled Paris in 1918 had a flight time of 170 seconds (Popular Mechanics)
In the book Wired for War it's mentioned (pg 56) that Pioneer drones (Wiki, RQ-2) were used as spotters for the 16" guns on a battleship. That implies the accuracy was not good and the gun needed to be "walked onto the target". (short article Wired for War by Singer)
Note the same problem exists with Depth Charges. They are launched from a moving ship, take some time to sink (especially the early cylindrical "ash can" type) and are intended to be near enough to a moving submarine to cause damage. The streamlined Mk 9 depth charge was designed to reduce the time between launch and detonation. I'm sure it did that, but was it enough to improve the results?
Another case where the actual range far exceeds what's practical is the air-to-air RADAR guided missile. When using a missile Beyond Visual Range (Wiki) there is always the chance of fratricide (Wiki) which is hard to fix.
2413573 Fire control system, Earl E Libman, Control Instrument Co, Filed: 1944-08-21, W.W.II, Pub: 1946-12-31, 235/406; 235/416 - gun on m moving ship firing on another moving ship
2403506 Gunfire Control Computer, anti aircraft 1941, 1946
2762565 Anti-aircraft gun computer, Earl E Libman, Aaron D Fialkow, John W Bozeman, Gerst Irving, Control Instrument Co, 1956-09-11, -
Also see Norden Bomb Sight (It did NOT work as advertised)
Mechanical Computer (All Parts) - Basic Mechanisms In Fire Control Computers -
Mk 15 torpedo Run Times
Note that the speed is coupled to range because more fuel is burned at higher speeds. Or you could say when selecting the range (the numbers look better, i.e. 6, 10 or 15 thousand yards) the speed is determined (45, 33 or 26 knots).
5,500 m (6,000 yards)
45 k (25 y/s)
240 sec (4 min)
9,150 m (10,000 yards)
33 k (18.5 y/s)
540 sec (9 min)
13,700 m (15,000 yards)
26 k (14.6 y/s)
1027 sec (17 minutes)
So, the run time to maximum range is so great that it's questionable that any moving target could be hit. If the target ship was not aware that they were being fired on and continued in a straight line (i.e. did not Zig-Zag) then MAYBE they could be hit, but even then the probably of a hit would be very small. Add in any ocean current and the odds go to near zero.
114/23 Ship/Torpedo/steering mechanism2452068 Sound pickup device, Robert E Peterson, Submarine Signal Co, Filed: Jan 23, 1943, Pub: Oct 26, 1948, 367/150, 181/176, 367/165 -
2382058 Torpedo, Hull Maury I, Aug 14, 1945, 114/23, 89/1.51, 318/480, 361/183, 244/190, 318/460, 367/133, 318/16, 114/21.2 - acoustic homing
2420676 Submarine signaling apparatus, Robert E Peterson, Submarine Signal Co, May 20, 1947, 114/23, 367/150, 114/21.1, 116/27, 181/402, 114/21.3 - torpedo application
2447639 Torpedo battery compartment, Daly Thomas A, Westinghouse Electric Corp, Aug 24, 1948, 114/20.1, 114/65.00R - Fido Mk 24???
2572116 Sectionalized torpedo, Daly Thomas A, Filed: Oct 7, 1946, Pub: Oct 23, 1951, 114/22, 114/21.1, 114/24 - Fido Mk 24
2615416 Variable enabler for acoustic torpedoes, Daly Thomas A, Gill Harry A, Sec of Navy, Filed: Nov 21, 1946 (6 year delay), Pub: Oct 28, 1952, 114/23, 200/38.00R - can set the turn on of the acoustic homing to start from 500 to 4000 Feet. - Fido Mk 24
2938486 Torpedo depth control system, Beatty Charles G, Daly Thomas A, Jones Leonard S, Osbon William O, Stephen, Sec of Navy, May 31, 1960, 114/25 -
2974620 Triaxial control system, Daly Thomas A, Malick Franklin S, Voorhees John C, Sec of Navy, Filed: Jul 15, 1953, Pub: Mar 14, 1961, 114/23 - El, Az & Roll
3228370 Electrical control systems, Daly Thomas A, Kowalyshyn Jr Stepben, Sec of Navy, Filed: Jan 28, 1950 (16 year delay) Pub: Jan 11, 1966, 114/20.1, 388/854 - Fido Mk 24??? - electric motor drive = no wake, battery voltage variation problem for tube filaments, slow speed for low noise OK for freighters (and subs)
Acoustic homing torpedo,R Dunlap, Us Navy, Filed: Jun 15, 1964, Pub: Apr 24, 1973, 114/23, 367/150, 114/21.1, 367/151, 367/96 -
The early torpedos just used a "contact pistol" (Wiki) that also included some Safe and Arm (Wiki) features. For example a propeller at the nose that need to make some number of turns before contact can cause an explosion. This would prevent a shipping accident from setting off an an unwanted explosion.
At the start of W.W.II the Mk 14 torpedo (Wiki) used a magnetic influence exploder (Wiki: Magnetic Pistol) that should have triggered the explosion under the keel of a surface ship, but because, among other things, the depth control caused the torpedo to run about 12 feet too deep it did not work most of the time. I guessing that there was also a polarity problem in that the influence exploder was developed in the Northern Hemisphere so when used in the Southern Hemisphere or near the Equator the polarity of the coil output would act to cutoff the Thyratron tube (Wiki) rather that start it conducting. This was compounded by a defect in the contact fuze resulting in a very high number of duds for the first half of W.W. II. The later Mk VI exploders included an improved metal ball contact exploder that worked at any practical contact angle.
1047157 Device for determining direction, Donald M Bliss, Dec 17, 1912, 33/362, 324/257 - a coil is motor driven and the Earth's magnetic field generates a voltage that can be used as a compass. This earth inductor compass uses a motor to rotate the coil, but in the case of the Mk 14 torpedo the magnetic exploder depends on the the movement of the torpedo. The problem is that depending where in the world it's located and it's magnetic bearing and how much vibration the coil is experiencing and which hemisphere it's in the coil output may or may not trigger either when there's a ship nearby or not.
I'm guessing that details on the exploder for each torpedo is part of the classified aspect since it does not show up in tabulated descriptions.
Essentially the exploder was just a fluxmeter. This is just a coil that senses the voltage generated when the magnetic filed changes. The amount of voltage depends on the strength of the magnetic field AND how fast the field changes AND the polarity of the field. The polarity of the output voltage depends on the polarity of the magnetic field and the relative direction of motion between the target and torpedo.
A thyratron, such as the 2D21 (Valve Museum), will conduct when the grid No. 1 voltage exceeds 2 to 6 Volts. One thing that might cause that is a vibration of the torpedo body and passing near a moderate magnetic filed either a target (but far from it) or not near any target but near a hunk of magnetized metal on the sea bed.
The San Francisco Maritime organization has restored the USS PAMPANITO (SS-383) submarine and as part of that has on line manuals for a large number of it's systems. OP 635, Torpedoes, Mark 14 and 23 Types, A Bureau of Ordinance Publication, 24 March 1945 includes the following photos of the Mk 6-5 Exploder along with a chapter on it. Note the 1945 date, so NOT the Mk 6 that caused many problems.
The torpedo is shipped broken down into four parts:
1. the nose that contains the exploder and explosives, or a training version
2. the compressed air flask
3. the afterbody or engine room which contains the combustion flask, dual stage counter-rotating turbine horizontal and vertical steering engines
4. the tail with the horizontal and vertical fins as well as the counter rotating propellers.
It appears that the Mk 6-5 exploder has the magnetic influence function active, but the books I've read say that it was deactivated for the last half of W.W. II. What's the story?
The torpedo tube has provision to set the following parameters:1. Gyro angle
3. hi or low speed
My reading of the TDC function says it is constantly setting the gyo angle so that it's correct at the time the torpedo is fired.
Fig 1 Cross section showing exploder location
Fig 2 bottom view of nose with exploder removed.
Fig 3 Exploder shown on bench with added legs to keep it stable. Note The add-on ball switch trigger to replace the defective contact exploder.
Fig 4 Exploder showing the water channel and impeller used both for safe and arm as well
as DC electrical generation.
Fig 5 Exploder detonator. Note how might
fold over and jam from a head on hit.
Fig 6 Practice nose that ejects plywood disks when exploder fires.
420406 Submarine Ram and Torpedo Exploder, W.K. Cavett, Jan 28, 1890, 114/3; 114/19 - maybe classes: 114/19; 114/18
3720165 Torpedo exploder mechanism, T Dinsmoor, Navy, App: 1952-03-14 (SECRET), Pub: 1973-03-13, 102/428; 102/223; 102/416; 102/216; 102/247 -
2514359 fuze Proximity , Allison Malcolm G, Filed: Dec 28, 1945, Pub: Jul 11, 1950, 102/209, 324/257, 310/66, 102/212 - anti-aircraft, based on coil and rectifier (not a very good idea)
2645180 Torpedo exploder, John M Stockard, Filed: Nov 17, 1949, Pub: Jul 14, 1953, 102/226; 102/230; 102/416; 114/20.1 - Contact type, with Safe and Arm safety features.
1382374 Method and mechanism for exploding submarine mines, Hudson Maxim, Jun 21, 1921, 102/417, 114/20.1 - Iron sensor bar held in field of permanent magnet so the Earth's field is not a factor.
2397137 Magnetic controlling device, Glennon James B, Maltby Wilson R, Sellman Albert H, Filed: Jun 25, 1941, Pub: Mar 26, 1946, 340/850, 324/259, 340/551, 102/417 - magnetic needle held by PM. - sea mines
Mk 6 Exploder for the Mk 14 Torpedo?
2397678 Torpedo exploding mechanism, Minkler Chester T, Filed: May 9, 1932, (12 year delay) Pub: Apr 2, 1946, 114/21.1, 102/427
- works with Bronze or steel casing. The Permaloy core sticks out of both ends of the 480,000 Turn coil. (only 1 coil).
17: high current triode.
This is not a magnetometer, but rather just am Earth Induction (Wiki, 1047157) pickup coil (11) driving the gird of a triode tube with the trigger solenoid (20) in the plate circuit. This is really just an electric generator.
2398801 Magnetically controlled torpedo firing mechanism, Chester T Minkler, App: 1933-06-15, (12 year delay) Pub: 1946-04-23, -
A new type of vacuum tube (16) is used to drive the high current triode (14). This is a cylindrical tube with the sense coil wound around the outside.
1368569, Hydrostatic mine, 1921-02-15, - looks like the Ash Can (see below)
2462118 Torpedo exploding mechanism, Chester T Minkler, App:1932-12-06, 17 year delay( ), Pub: 1949-02-22, - Photoelectric exploded to work by ship's shadow, not a test device.
2617703 Torpedo exploding mechanism, Chester T Minkler, App:1933-05-09, ( year delay), Pub: 1952-11-11, - designed for testing exploders, not a wartime device.
Fig 3: Generator version circuit
Fig 4: Battery version circuit
Fig 5: photo-electric cell near window
Fig 6: Camera showing projection lamp and mirror
Fig 7: Camera elevation opening for recording beams
Fig 8: Contact
Fig 9: light flash device.
2436394 Magnetic detector, Maltby Wilson R, Park Robert H, Filed: Jun 6, 1941, Pub: Feb 24, 1948, 102/417, 324/258, 336/90, 340/850, 336/233 - about the shape of the magnetic core of the sense coil.
2468968 Magnetic field strength indicator, Bell Telephone Labor Inc, Filed: Apr 20, 1943, Pub: May 3, 1949 324/246, 340/870.33, 324/253, 324/345 - 3-axis magnetometer
2477337 Magnetic Detector, William E. Kahl, Bel Labs, July 26, 1949 - mostly about sine wave coil drive and how even & odd harmonics come about
2016977 Direction responsive system, Henry P Thomas, Gen Electric, Oct 8, 1935, 33/361, 340/870.32, 324/255 - aircraft magnetic compass
2053154 Direct-current indicator, La Pierre Cramer W, Gen Electric, Sep 1, 1936, 324/99.00R, 336/87, 73/1.76, 324/254, 324/155, 336/110, 33/361, 340/870.3v3, 324/117.00R - 3-phase aircraft compass?
2252059 Method and a device for determining the magnitudes of magnetic fields, Gustav Barth, Siemens App Und Maschinen Gmbh, Aug 12, 1941, 324/253, 102/427, 102/417, 340/870.33, 33/361 - Flux gates
2415808 Detection of large magentic bodies, Oliver E Buckley, Bell Telephone Labor Inc, Filed: Jul 31, 1941, Pub: Feb 18, 1947, 324/67, 340/850, 324/243, 324/255, 324/345, 333/138, 340/870.33 - differential magnetometer for Submarine detection
2485931 Magnetic field strength indicator, Thaddeus Slonczewski, Bell Telephone Labor Inc, Filed: Apr 20, 1943, Pub: Oct 25, 1949, 324/247, 102/417, 340/870.33, 102/427 - 3-axis Earth's filed measurement.
2555209 Method and apparatus for measuring the values of magnetic fields, Gary Muffly, Vacquier Victor V, Gulf Research Development Co, Filed: Nov 1, 1943, Pub: May 29, 1951, 324/246, 324/345, 324/253, - aligns MAD sensors with Earth's magnetic filed
2968242 Torpedo exploding mechanism, Erwood Beck Charles, Joseph Erwood, Wilbur Goss, Sec of Navy, Filed: Jun 20, 1946, Pub: Jan 17, 1961, 102/206, 102/212, 102/263 - battery powered, combined magnetic & contact. Since filed in 1946 the torpedo must have been operational near that date. Where used? Let me know.
Maybe for Fido Mk 24 (Wiki)? used the "Mk 142 contact fuze"
Alternate torpedos might be the Mk 13 (Wiki) or Cutie Mk 27 (Wiki) uses the Mk 11 Mod 2 contact exploder
914371 Firing means for torpedoes, Cleland Davis, Mar 2, 1909, - propeller on front for safety and Contact trigger
1382374 (see above)
2060198 Echo torpedo detonator, Hammond Jr John Hays, Nov 10, 1936, 114/21.2, 114/21.3, 102/211, 114/23, 102/418, 367/96 - active ultrasonic (20 kc) a clockwork switches the power to the transmitter or receiver so that the receiver is never on at the same time as the transmitter, so only a delayed/reflected signal will activate the receiver.
Calls:2397678 Torpedo exploding mechanism (See above)
1518123 Exciting means for electrodynamical oscillators, Jr Harry P Lawther, Filed: Aug 29, 1918, Pub: Dec 2, 1924, 367/175 - Ultrasonic transmitter includes diaphragm for underwater use
1625245 Receiving system for compressional waves, Dorsey Herbert Grove, Filed: Jun 22, 1918, Pub: Apr 19, 1927, 181/141, 367/130, 114/20.3, 367/902 - narrow band ultrasonic receiver for underwater use
2404553 (see above)
2972026 Damped inertia switch, Kendall James M, Filed: May 7, 1948 (13 year delay) Pub: Feb 14, 1961, - maybe denator for Fido Mk 24
2993440 Control device, Chubb Lewis W, Prescott Herbert L, Sidney Siegel,Sec of Navy, Filed: Apr 6, 1945, Pub: Jul 25, 1961, 102/212, 102/417 102/212, 102/417 - Mk 18 Torpedo application, 2-coil gradiometer, bronze warhead for magnetic reasons. 1/2" dia rods with pure iron, threaded for balance, end caps, 200,000 Turns in each coil,
There is a movie "The Human Torpedoes Of WWII" about these. They are really midget (Wiki) or wet (Wiki) submarines that carry a couple of frogmen (Wiki). They also carry explosives, like a Limpet Mine (Wiki) that is attached to a ship at anchor by the divers with a time fuze (Wiki). In the movie they show the explosive being attached to the Human Torpedo by a crane and later an illustration of it being under the keel of a ship supported by cables going to either side of the ship. It is not clear how two men can do that.An important difference between frogmen (Wiki) and SCUBA (self-contained underwater breathing apparatus) (Wiki: diving, set) commonly refers to an open cycle breathing system where the exhaled breath causes bubbles. A key idea for the Human Torpedo is that the frogman use rebreathers (Wiki) so that no bubbles go to the surface and there is no associated "bubble noise" generated.
Because there has been a threat from swimmers attaching limpet mines to ships in harbor starting as far back as the Civil War, there are also counter measures used to stop it. The movie mentioned that these sometimes worked but not how.
Early Naval mines (Wiki) bristled with contact fuzes and a ship needed to bump into the mine to set it off. But later versions made use of magnetic influence exploders.
The 'superweapon' that almost won Hitler the war! - German magnetic mine exploder (note it's on gimbals!)
This led to anti-mining by use of man made magnetic fields or by use of wooden minesweeper (Wiki) ships. Mining enemy harbors has been used as a way to deny the enemy supplies. A blockade of the South was used during the U.S. Civil War (Wiki). This was a very big thing for Japan in W.W.II.
The method of triggering a mine might be any combination of:
1. Mechanical contact
2. magnetic influence (Wiki: Influence Mine)
3. pressure - not weather or tides, but a heavy ship
4. gravity - not tides or small boats, but a heavy ship
6. AC Impedance
7. Electrical galvanic action where the metal in the ship, sea water and copper electrodes form a battery
It was the experience gained with Naval Mines in W.W. I that the effect was much larger when the mine exploded under ship and broke the keel that led torpedo designers to come up with a magnetic influence exploder.A countermeasure for magnetic influence mines is Deguassing a ship (Wiki) so that it's less likely to set off the mine. This was a big thing before the existence of magnetometers, i.e. when the sensor worked on Earth Induction, like the Mk 6 exploder.
A Counter countermeasure is for the mine to include a counter so it does not explode on the first magnetic anomaly, but after many. So a man made magnetic field is unlikely to set it off.
The naval mines used in the second half of W.W.II were designed to be launched from various platforms including 21" torpedo tubes. Two mines took up the same storage space as one torpedo so a sub could carry twice as many mines as torpedoes. But, the captain and crew counted number of ships sank for the total of their tonnage which was mostly possible with torpedoes but not so much with mines. The purpose of naval mines is more about stopping or slowing down shipping than about the number of ships sank or total tonnage. If you close a harbor it really does not matter if any ships are sunk, just that the supplies do not get through. So there was an inherent conflict of interest when a sub was tasked with laying mines. The reason to use a sub as a mine laying vehicle is that it can do the job in cases where ships or planes could not do it.
In the book Pig Boats (Submarines Ref 5) it says that in 1943 some subs were equipped with mine hunting technology developed by the University of California. While, so far, I haven't found a patent for it, I suspect it was a form of active SONAR (Wiki - SSQ-32) that allows imaging in two dimensions so the mine could be "seen" on a CRT (Wiki)
Table of mines (reconstructed from Oceanography and Mine Warfare, Chapter 2 An Overview - where it appears on four pages so not at all usable.
Note 21" Width & Height = 533 mm.
19" Width & Height = 485 mm.
Country Name Type
Operational Depth (m)
Brazil MCF-100 Moored contact Can be programmed to remain inert for a fixed period of time, then self-release and anchor itself at the desired depth; can be fitted with an influence sensor.
MTP-19 Cable-controlled Fully remote controlled; can be operated at distances of 12 km or more; consists of a portable weapon control unit, distribution box, and the mine itself.
SM G2 Ground influence Has a non-magnetic casing with acoustic, magnetic, and pressure influence sensors; mine will detonate when preset influence parameters are recognized.
DM 211 Anti-frogman underwater
Anti-frogman depth charge protects ships and harbor installations against divers; signal charge is used for encoded submarine-to-surface ship communications.
DM 221 Iraq A1 Floodable submersible
Possibly the largest mine in the world that is designed to destroy offshore structures; operates even in very deep water; timer or remote-control detonation.
Sigeel/400 Ground Seabed mine for deep and shallow water; for use against medium and large targets; can be ship or helicopter deployed.
Italy MR-80 Seabed influence Actuated by magnetic, acoustic, and pressure influences from the target; body is composed of epoxy resin and glass fibre.
Seabed influence Similar influence activation as the MR-80 but with microprocessors to discriminate between target and countermeasures.
Seabed influence Similar to MP-80 but with an advanced microprocessor-firing device.
150 or 180
Shallow seabed influence A dual influence (magnetic and acoustic) anti-invasion mine shaped to rest firmly on the seabed even in strong flows.
Moored influence Programmable mine that can operate on any type of bottom against all types of targets; can select targets and discriminate against countermeasures; can be remotely controlled.
15–35 to 15–300
MDM 1–5 Seabed influence Can be laid from a variety of platforms, activated with either acoustic-magnetic or acoustic-magnetic-pressure sensors.
SMDM series Self-propelled seabed Similar to MDM mines but are placed in the body of a torpedo to be laid by submarines.
PMK-1 Underwater rocket-powered torpedo A combined mine based on a torpedo with an on-board computer and sensor to identify the target and compute the required trajectory; detonation using combined influence, contact, and time fuze.
MSHM Continental shelf Acoustic sensor detects and identifies the target, computes the required trajectory before the underwater rocket is fired to home in on the target.
Moored influence An intelligent multi-influence mine, parameters can be programmed into the weapon's computer before deployment; incorporates anti-minesweeping countermeasures.
Naval limpet Time-fuzed mine that can be used as a demolition charge; attached to underwater structures mechanically or magnetically. 350 350
Sweden BGM 100 Anti-invansion ground influence Advanced gliding mine shape allows mine-laying over a wide area while covering the minimal distance; low-profile shape makes it difficult to detect; constructed of reinforced plastic. 1,015 800
BMM 80 Moored influence Programmed to anchor itself automatically at the desired depth before sinking. 1,125
20–200 BGM 601 Ground influence Developed as a submarine weapon to be attached to the outer hull; incorporates multiple sensors with sophisticated logic making it resistant to countermeasures. 2,000
BGM 600 Cable-controlled Developed to provide a rapid means of deploying a controlled minefield. 1,700 600
Sea Urchin Programmable influence An intelligent seabed mine that can be programmed to detonate by a range of influences when the target is at the closest approach point. 1,440–2,540
Stonefish Ground influence Designed to be modular to fit any requirement; detonation by acoustic, magnetic, and pressure sensors with signal processing capabilities. 2,500
Mk 52, 55, 56, and 57 Seabed influence These mines are now obsolete although many are still in inventory; activated using magnetic, acoustic, and pressure sensors. 2,250–3,000 844–1,060 844–1,060 542–1,010
Mk 36, 40, 41, and 115A Air-laid influence Detonated using magnetic and acoustic sensors; intended for use in shallow water; obsolete although many are still in inventory. 2,250–3,830
400–630 240–926 24–204 45–91 Quickstrike series 62 & 63
Air-launched seabed Group of mines with different cases but common target detection and classification mechanisms; based on conversion of existing ordinance.
Use Mk 82 (500#) and Mk 83 (1000#) bombs
Encapsulated torpedo A Mk 46 torpedo inserted into a mine casing; used for anti-submarine warfare; can classify targets and initiate the release of the torpedo; employs both passive and active sensors. 3,700
Mk 67 SLMM Sub-Launched Mobile Mine
Self-propelled mine for use in shallow water and where covert mining is desirable; detonation using magnetic, acoustic, and pressure sensors. 4,090
Yugoslavia M66 Diversionary underwater Nearly non-magnetic housing; timed fuze settings; once emplaced and activated cannot be removed. 670
M70 Acoustic influence seabed Employs highly sensitive sensors with a large explosive charge; can be laid from multiple platforms. 2,823
M-71 Limpet Attached magnetically and mechanically; fitted with a time fuze. 345
San Francisco Maritime Org:
Ordnance Pamphlet No. 898 Mine Identification, October 1943 -
Operational Characteristics of U.S. Naval Mines (U), ORD 696(B), 1959,
Mine Disposal Handbook, 1945
Bibliography from "Mines Away!"( Mines_Away.pdf)
Joint Direct Attack Munition (Wiki: JDAM) - Naval Mine Kit - can be used with 80 series iron bombs to make them into Naval mines which can be dropped from 35,000 feet.
1295051 Drifting mine, Chester T Minkler, 1919-02-18, - to be hung from a float to attack submarines.
542732 Submarine Mine, W.M. Huskisson, July 16, 1895, 102/417 - Hughes (Wiki) induction balance
571739 Electromagnetic sentinel, Francis B. Isadt, Nov 24, 1896, - an iron core coil is excited with an AC signal and when an iron clad ship is nearby the impedance change shows it's presence.
1025905 Automatic firing device for submarine mines, G E Elia, May 7, 1912, 102/423 - all mechanical
1167278 Device for automatically anchoring submarine mines at a predetermined depth independently of the bottom of the sea, Giovanni Emanuele Elia, Vickers Ltd, Jan 4, 1916, 102/413 - the high qty sea mine with auto depth setting (No. 6/)
1295051 Drifting mine, Chester T Minkler, Us Government, Feb 18, 1919, 102/422 - includes provision to sink after some Sal Ammoniac (Wiki) dissolves.
1390768 Submarine mine, Grove Dorsey Herbert, Filed: Dec 14, 1915, Pub: Sep 13, 1921, - spherical, replaces trigger wire from shore with underwater acoustic signal using tuning fork.
1466915 Submarine mine, Nichols Ernest Fox, Sec of Navy, 1923-09-04, -
The gimbals are to keep the cylinder vertical.
It's made of aluminum and filled with kerosene.
Magnets 25 & 34 react to a change in external magnetic field.
The application date for this patent is 1918, well before W.W.II. so is not the German trigger.
It does have an explanation for the presence of gimbals.
1491004 Explosive mine, Duffie John J, Us Government (Berkeley, Calif.), Filed: Nov 18, 1918, Pub: Apr 22, 1924, - combines a microphone and clockwork so loud sound needs to be present for more than an instant.
1535633 Submarine contact mine, Sperry Elmer A, Apr 28, 1925, 102/421 - buoyant, but bottom anchored, sub torpedo tube launched
1538316 Explosive mine, Duffie John J, Filed: Feb 8, 1918, Pub: May 19, 1925, - loud sound waves set it off, uses a meter movement with contacts on needle.
1780592 Sink mine, Johansson Karl Oskar Reinhold, Lindholmen, 1930-11-04, -
1844575 Mine, J.K.M. Harrison, Feb 9, 1932 102/421 - sphere hangs below float
1814152 Marine mine and firing method therefor, John K M Harrison, 1931-07-14, - sphere hangs below float
2399523 Control system and device therefor for submarine mines, Atta Chester M Van, Whitehead Richard H, Filed: Feb 7, 1942, Pub: Apr 30, 1946, 102/417, 29/455.1 - hydro-static pressure, compass needle and clockwork - requires a particular sequence within a time frame to detonate.
2419815 Water armed fuze, George E Breeze, Godwin R F Gay, Navy, App: 1944-10-03, Pub: 1947-04-29, - water activates mine, then contact explodes it
2431319 Magnetic firing device, Ellwood Walter B, Filed:Feb 9, 1943, Pub: Nov 25, 1947, - versions for both the ash-can and Mk 9 depth charge
2465009 Concussion detonator, Chase Leland H, Mar 22, 1949, 102/416, 102/230, 102/222 - diaphragm input
2881702 Mine firing mechanism, Glennon James B, Hobbs Charles A, Maltby Wilson R, Park Robert H, Filed: Aug 9, 1941, (18 year delay) Pub: Apr 14, 1959, - looks for change in magnetic field with time matching a ship and so can discriminate against mine sweeping man made magnetic fields. Uses telephone stepping relays
2892402 Gravity controlled mine firing mechanism, Park Robert H, Filed: Dec 8, 1941, (13 year delay) Pub: Jun 30, 1959, - not effected by tides or small craft, but triggers when heavy ship is nearby. (see my page on Gravity meters, which lists Wright Gravity Meters under Historical - spring suspended mass
2892403 Mine firing mechanism, Edward S Gilfillan, James B Glennon, Robert H Park, Iii Elihu Root, Filed: Sep 18, 1941, (18 year delay) Pub: Jun 30, 1959, - combines sound, pressure and magnetic influence.
3015273 Magnetic mine firing control mechanism, Gilfillan Edward S, Park Robert H, Sindeband Seymour J, Jan 2, 1962, 102/417 -
3252417 Arming and firing mechanism, Jr Virgil H Johnson (also see Hill), Magnavox, 1966-05-24, - arms when below set depth and un-arms above that set depth - maybe for torpedo?
3649908 Magnetic field gradiometer utilizing a pair of cores driven by a blocking oscillator, Robert E Brown, Navy, 1972-03-14, - sensitive magnetic mine sensor (also see Joule Thief)
4188905 Mine sweeping means, Royal Weller, Harry S. Jones, Navy, App: 1943-04-13, (SECRET) Pub: 1980-02-19, 114/253; 102/403; 114/244 - for pressure controlled sea mines
4274333 Deepwater target-seeking mines, Glen T. Lampton, Sec of Navy, Filed: Dec 28, 1959 (22 year delay ), Pub: Jun 23, 1981, 102/418, 102/411 - looks like torpedo, but does not have any power unit. Propelled from bottom by bouncy and steered by sound.
4447776 Pulse driver for flux gate magnetometer, Robert E. Brown, Navy, 1984-05-08, - very energy efficient fluxgate magnetometer
USS Princeton (CG-59) 1991 mine (Wiki) damage.
Operation Starvation (Wiki) US mining Japan W.W.II
The British Hedgehog (Wiki) is a spigot mortar (Wiki) mounted on the bow of a ship, aka: Anti-submarine Projector. They were fitted with contact fuze on the front end so only would explode if a direct hit on a submarine (or the ocean bottom?). After all the mortar shells have been launched the launcher has the appearance of a Hedgehog or Porcupine. They weigh about 30 pounds each. They can be fired in front of a moving ship which was a big advantage since ash cans or depth charges only could be fired to the side or stern.
From Ref 3 -The British Hedgehog was a mortar type and put heavy loads on the ship so only large ships could use it. The American Mousetrap (Wiki) was rocket powered and so could be fitted to much smaller/lighter ships. Ref 16.
An offshoot was the retro-rocket bomb, available in three aircraft speeds (200, 205 & 400 MPH), that fell straight down, unlike iron bombs that have a forward velocity that matches the plane. These were first used with the PBY5A. (Naval History: retro-bomb)
The idea is to drop explosives that damage or destroy an enemy submarine.
YouTube: Military History in a Minute: H1MIN: Mark 9 Depth Charge, 1:14 - compared to Mk 6 ash can.
maritime.org: Ordnance Pamphlet 866, Depth Charge, Mark 9, and Modifications, 1944
Early depth charges (Wiki) were called "ash cans" because that's what they looked like, i.e. a cylinder with flat ends. The fuze could be set for the depth at which it would explode. One of the problems with the "ash cans" was that they went down slowly with the centerline approximately horizontal and so a submarine could escape before they got to depth.
1314662 Depth-mine firing-gear and safety device therefor, James Huber, Vickers, 1919-09-02, -
1368569, Hydrostatic mine, Chester T Minkler, 1921-02-15,
2780992 Firing mechanism for a depth charge, Ronald O Beach, App: 1945-08-18, Pub: 1957-02-12, -
"Another object is the provision of a hydrostatically con trolled switch for a depth charge firing mechanism which will not be prematurely operated by pressure waves such, for example, as pressure waves resulting from the detonation of an explosive charge within the vicinity of the depth charge.
Still another object is to provide a switch of the afore described character which operates satisfactorily over a wide range of depths such, for example, as 50 to 1500 feet.
A further object is the provision of a new and im proved hydrostatically controlled switch for a depth charge firing system which will render the system inef fective when the depth charge has descended to a predetermined depth in the event the depth charge is not fired during the descent thereof."
The Mk IX depth charge was designed for rapid decent (centerline approximately vertical) and has optional spoiler plates so it can also have controlled slower rates of decent.
Depth charges can be rolled off a rack and dropped overboard or they can be projected using a sort of mortar to throw them some distance from the ship.San Francisco Maritime org:
Depth Charge, Mark 9 and Modifications, OP 866, 1944, covers the fast sinking U.S.N. depth charge of WW II.
The Mk 1 Mod 1 firing pistol can be set for: 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400 or 500 feet.
Depth Charges, Mark 6, Mark 6 Mod. 1, Mark 7, Mark 7, Mod. 1, OP 747, 1943, covers the U.S.N. depth charge from the first half of WW II. - this is the "ash can". The possible depths for the Mk 6 pistol are: 30, 50, 75, 100, 150, 250 and 300 feet and the Mk 6-1 pistol adds a 600 foot setting.
ASW Weapons - Mk 20 Mousetrap rocket projector 7.2" (180mm) 0.2 - 0.7 second burn time - American hedge hog
2599579 Streamline depth charge, Robert H Park, Arthur G Russell, Waldron S Macdonald, Robert R Crookston, pp: 1943-02-01, (9 year delay ), Pub: 1952-06-10, - has rings on both ends so handles like 55 Gallon Drum "ash can". -
This is the Mk 9 fast decent depth charge used in W.W. II.
2641184 Streamline depth charge, Booth Seth W, Park Robert H, Royal Weller, Russell Arthur G, Filed: Aug 25, 1942, Pub: Jun 9, 1953, 102/391, 340/850, 102/417, 367/93, 324/257 - This is the Mk 9 fast decent depth charge used in W.W. II. mentions 2962966.
2962966 Firing control circuit, Gieseler Luther P, Filed: Apr 18, 1946, Pub: Dec 6, 1960 (14 year delay), 102/391, 102/417 - magnetometer magnetic influence fuze (see Fluxgate Patents) for depth charge.
2399248 Depth charge projector, Gebhard Edward P, Patrick Jr William E, Filed: May 27, 1942, Pub: Apr 30, 1946 - YouTube video showing its use with Mk 9 depth charge.
Patents Published Nov 29, 1960 with sequential patent numbers (many with many years delay because of classification)2961954 Depth charge firing mechanism, Axelson Carl A, Moore Harry H, Stearns David M, Stresau Richard H F, Filed: Feb 1, 1943 (17 year delay ) Pub: Nov 29, 1960 - depth, time and magnetic influence combined.
2961955 Depth charge arming device, Macdonald Waldron S, Filed: Feb 11, 1946 (14 year delay), Pub: Nov 29, 1960, -
2961956 Arming mechanism for a depth charge, Townsend Richard W, Filed: Jan 6, 1947, (13 year delay) Pub: Nov 29, 1960, 102/392 - can only arm after a preset depth, can deactivate below some preset depth, does not respond to rapid pressure changes (like nearby depth charges going off), includes some time delay elements in the arming function, Fig 16 shows a magnetic influence trigger that is only connected to the batteries after a preset depth is reached. When the next preset depth is reached the arming circuit becomes active (maybe allowing time for the vacuum tubes to warm up). Cites prior French and Italian patents.
2962966 Calls:2961957 Anchor release for a moored drill mine, Sylvan Wolf, Sec of Navy, Nov 29, 1960, - for training
1310568 Acoustically Operated Contact Actuating Mechanism and System Employing the Same, A.C. Heap & A.B. Field, UK, July 22, 1919, 102/418, 114/240.00R, 367/135 - submarine triggers mine
1382374 Method and mechanism for exploding submarine mines,
1448976 Submarine mine, Palmer Wayne F, Mar 20, 1923, 102/417 - Magnetic influence, ompass needle with counter mining and self setting features
1538315 Thermomicrophonic firing device for submerged mines, Duffie John J, U.S. Government, Filed: Aug 9, 1917, Pub: May 19, 1925, 102/418, 367/133 - acoustic trigger with timer to allow installation
2341351 Aerial mine, Barkley Joseph Amos, Filed: May 15, 1941, Pub: Feb 8, 1944, 102/405, 361/189, 327/516, 361/170, 244/31, 102/211, 361/182, 367/135, 244/87 - acoustic to be triggers by nearby aircraft (not very practical)
2404553 Electric fuze and setting apparatus, Wales Jr Nathaniel B, Filed: Aug 6, 1941, Pub: Jul 23, 1946, 102/219, 89/6, 315/227.00R, 327/100 - artillery shells
2404806 Submarine detector, Lindsey Henry A D, U.S. Army, Filed: Mar 19, 1942, Pub: Jul 30, 1946, 340/850, 102/402, 324/247, 324/331 - MAD (Wiki) towed by aircraft
Split: 2379447 Anti-submarine Device, Lindsey Henry A D, U.S. Army, Filed: Mar 19, 1942, Pub: Jul 3, 1945, 102/417, 102/212, 340/551, 324/247, 324/67, 307/652, 324/258, 340/552 - Very similar to the device in 2404806 except the part that was in the aircraft is now floating on the ocean surface and the MAD detector is now suspended underwater some distance. When the magnetic field of the submarine motor battery circuit is sensed it fires a small charge allowing the submerged mine to fall in the water and when at a predetermined depth it explodes.
2961958 Thermal controlled arming device for a mine, Brown Ellis M, Toomey John F, Filed: Mar 8, 1944, (16 year delay), Pub: Nov 29, 1960, - A large mechanical impulse (dropping the mine) can cause it to explode so this version uses a fusible alloy that melts to arm the mine. Also includes a sterilization feature to deactivate the mine.
2961959 Torpedo actuating lanyard seal, Lewis H Van Billiard, Gen Electric, Nov 29, 1960, - pull lanyard through watertight gland to activate torpedo
Calls:2961960 Torpedo exploder mechanism, Bob Norris, Kendall James M, Filed: Jul 20, 1949, (11 years delay) Pub: Nov 29, 1960, - Fido Mk 24 Exploder - time at depth needed to arm, triggered by inertia (contact) switch, sterilize at 500 feet
467792 Submarine Shell, George Frank Elliott, US Navy, Jan 26, 1892, - anti mine sweeping device.
2748704 Arming device for torpedo exploders, Dinsmoor Theodore E, Jun 5, 1956, - prevents assembly with actuator in the armed position
Calls:2961961 Torpedo exploder mechanism, Holdrege Charles F, Kendall James M, Filed: May 26, 1947 (13 year delay), Pub: Nov 29, 1960, - for submarine launched acoustic homing torpedo aimed at surface ships - special provisions to allow for broaching (jumping out of the water and returning).
1121563 Automatic Steering Apparatus, Karl O. Leon, Dec 15, 1914 - sound based
2954734 Torpedo Exploder Mechanism James M. Kendall, Filed:Oct 17, 1947 (13 year delay) Pub: Oct 4, 1960 - does not work well with homing torpedoes because it makes noise
1892431 Echo torpedo, John Hays Hammond, Jr (Wiki)), Filed: Apr 2, 1928, Pub: Dec 27, 1932, - active SONAR
2419815 Water armed fuze, Breeze George E, Gay Godwin R F, Filed: Oct 3, 1944, Pub: Apr 29, 1947, - uses water activated battery
Calls:2961962 Trip-wire flare, Jackson Leonard D, Filed: Jan 19, 1945, (15 year delay), Pub: Nov 29, 1960 - I know used in Vietnam, but W.W.II?
1121563 (see above)
1137222 Torpedo and other submarine apparatus, Karl O. Leon, Leon Steering Device Company, Filed: Feb 11, 1908, Pub: Apr 27, 1915 - acoustic "...what I term a hydrophone..." (did Karl coin the word hydrophone)
1312510 Sound-controlled dirigible torpedo, George Baker, Aug 12, 1919 -
2419815 Water Armed Fuze (See above)
3136944 Total field magnetometer having series connected inductance elements for substantial removal of even harmonics, Filed:Aug 6, 1945, Pub:Jun 9, 1964, 324/247, 102/212 - depth charge - Note VJ day (Sep 2, 1945) was a month away when this was filed, so true magnetometer fuzes may not have been used in W.W.II.
Aircraft, NC-3 Gun Sight, Mk 20 Mod 4 Gun-Bomb-Rocket Sight, Navy Mk 18 Gyro Gun Sight
Gyroscopes - used to keep torpedo going in straight line
Flux Gate Patents - many of the single coil type were for Naval Mines.
DC Gaussmeter Model 1, Helmholtz Coils, GE Gauss Meter, AMY6 Polarity Tester
HT20 2000 mT Magnetic Flux Meter - this instrument has very similar capabilities, bur for a much lower price
Sensors - Magnetic - Helmholtz Coil
Submarines, Sonobuoys, CRT-1 Sonobuoy
Build it YOURSELF!, a REAL ELECTRIC MOTORWalker Scientific MG-3D Gaussmeter -
Electromagnetic Toy Engine
Gilbert DC 3-pole Electro-magnetic Machine
Leclanché Battery - wet cell
MESCO 1011 Toy Engine
No. 6 Dry Cell -
Toy Motor Kit & modern version as well as Science First demonstration motor -
Weeden DC 2-pole Electro-magnetic Machine -
DC Permenant Magnet Motors
Walker Scientific MG-3D Gaussmeter
Part Two: The great torpedo scandal, 1941-43Ref 16: The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Twentieth Century Weapons and Warfare, Vol 18 - Mousetrap
"The Mk.13 was a slower speed torpedo so it did not have the contact exploder problem and it used the Mk.4 exploder which did not have the magnetic influence feature." The information on the problem of the Magnetic Influence Exploder I think overlooks the polarity of the magnetic field. With one polarity the thyratron will turn on, but with the opposite polarity it will not. So in addition to the dependence on latitude there's a dependence on Northern vs. Southern hemisphere.
"In the case of the destroyer launched Mk.15, which was a few feet longer than the Mk.14 and carried a larger warhead, but otherwise nearly identical to the Mk.14, I have found no references to unequivocal torpedo failures. This may be because during a destroyer torpedo attack things are too hectic to permit a careful evaluation of torpedo performance."
Part Three: WW II devlopment of conventional torpedoes 1940-1946 -
Part Four: WW II development of homing torpedoes 1940 - 1946 -
Part Five - Post WW II Submarine Launched/Heavyweight Torpedoes -
"Three of the more important new concepts were wire guidance, discrimination and onboard attack logic." This is all there is about getting a torpedo to hit it's target. But the need for wire guidance is clear from my above comments about the range (how far a torpedo can go) being far far greater than the range at which the probability of a hit is 50%.
"The straight running steam, electric and Navol torpedoes, Mks.13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 23, which were operational3 at the end of the war continued as service weapons. By 1950 only Mks.14, 15 and 16 remained in service4 and the Mk.15 disappeared as trainable 21" torpedo tubes were removed from destroyers. Mark 16 (Navol) remained in service until 1975 and the venerable Mk.14 (steam) was not finally withdrawn from service until 6 March 19805. The three homing torpedoes that had entered service during WW-II, Mk.24 (air launched ASW), Mk.27 Mods.0 (submarine launched anti-escort) and Mk.28 (submarine launched anti-surface vessel) continued in service until they were replaced by improved weapons, the Mk.28 remaining in service until 1960. Many torpedo projects were discontinued, in some cases after reaching the prototype or pre-production stage."
" Prior to the mid-1960s Soviet submarines had diving depths of 650 to 1000 ft and submerged speeds under 30 knots. Early Mk.48 capabilities were clearly capable of attacking such targets. The advent of the Soviet ALPHA submarine with its non-magnetic titanium hull, 2500 foot diving depth (Wiki says 1150 feet) and submerged speed in excess of 40 knots apparently produced a validated threat against which the Chief of Naval Operations issued a new operational requirement in 1975. Two approaches to satisfying this requirement were initiated. The first was the Mk.48 "envelope expansion program", mentioned above, which exploited the capabilities of the existing torpedo. The second was essentially a new torpedo, ADCAP. The major changes in ADCAP involved entirely new digital electronics, inertial guidance (replacing the gyro system), a major reduction in volume devoted to electronics, a corresponding major increase in fuel capacity, a strengthened shell and, of course, inclusion of the Mk.48 envelope expansion features. The Mk.48 piston engine was retained but with a greater fuel flow rate to yield an estimated 63 knot speed. Much of the change was made possible by the introduction of integrated circuits, including microprocessors, whose small size made it possible to move many of the functions of the control group into the nose. The guidance wire spool was moved to a position aft of the enlarged fuel tank and other layout changes were made."
Wiki Pages related to Torpedoes.
Passive acoustic torpedoes
Mk 27 Mod 0: sub to surface ship homing torpedo
Mk 28 Mod 1:
Mk 34 Mod 1: double size Mk 24 (arrived too late for W.W.II)
Mk 27 Mod 4: Passive homing
Mk 32: launched from blimp, aircraft, ship, only goes down to 225 feet for circling.
Mk 41: only anti-sub weapon, launched only from aircraft, no lower limit to search circle
Mk 43 Mod 0: mini Mk 41 Mod 0, used tubes (warm up time) search depth limited to 500 ft
Mk 43 Mod 1: helicopter launch, search up or down, at "reversing depth" it will reverse up/down, has gyro controlled course prior to enabling pinging
Mk 35 Mod 12: classified (1953)
White Board: Types of Sea Mines - CAPTOR (Wiki) - Mk 46 torpedo in Capsulejaglavaksoldier:
PRC68, Alphanumeric Index of Web pages, Contact, Products for Sale
Page Created 11 June 2017